ArticleCancers2024
Comparison of Single-Use Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (sNPWT) and Standard Dressings Applied to the Same Patient During Bilateral Tissue Expander-to-Implant Exchanges.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical and economic impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in breast surgery: meta-analysis.The British journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Postoperative Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The number of cases is increasing among young women, and consequently, breast reconstructions are performed more often. Postoperative complications, wound healing, and the quality of scars influence the final cosmetic outcomes. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of using a negative-pressure therapy compared to a standard dressing on two postoperative wounds in the same woman, after bilateral tissue expander replacement surgery-when identical healing conditions occur.
methodsThis study includes a single-center evaluation of the application of two different dressings during bilateral exchanges of tissue expanders with breast implants. The study included 22 patients with a history of breast cancer after bilateral mastectomy with two-stage reconstruction. During the second stage, a sNPWT was applied to one breast and a standard dressing to the other.
resultsA statistically significant difference in skin elasticity in favor of sNPWT was visible after 7 days, while the greatest difference was visible in the evaluation after 6 months (mean of 0.806 vs. 0.607). A difference in temperature measurements was shown 7 days after the procedure. However, after 30 days, these measurements were similar. There was also a reduced incidence of postoperative complications as well as seroma accumulation in the breasts with negative pressure.
conclusionsThe results indicate faster healing, better scar quality, and improved skin elasticity in breasts with sNPWT compared to the standard dressing. The number of postoperative complications were also reduced, which is especially important in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.