Trial reportNutrients2024
Nutrient Intake and Dietary Adequacy Among Rural Tanzanian Infants Enrolled in the Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial.
Trial report in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Comparison of Aflatoxin Contamination and Dietary Exposure From Complementary Foods Among Rural Tanzanian Infants Enrolled in the Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- The Difficulties in Demonstrating That Aflatoxin Reduction Improves Stunting in Developing World Regions.Toxins · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial (MMT) was a community-based cluster-randomized trial designed to assess the effect of dietary aflatoxin (AF) on linear growth. Similar dietary intake between arms was an important component of the trial's program theory and essential for the trial's internal validity and interpretation.
objectiveThis analysis assessed and compared dietary intake by arm within a sub-sample of infants enrolled in the MMT.
methodsTwenty paired clusters (10 per trial arm) out of the 52 MMT clusters were included in this sub-sample. Up to 15 maternal/infant dyads per cluster were randomly selected for a one-time, structured, multi-pass 24 h dietary recall. Data were collected at the midpoint of the trial, when infants were 12 months of age, over 8 calendar months. We evaluated and compared infant nutrient intake and adequacy of energy, protein, lipid, iron, zinc, calcium, and vitamin A between study arms. Nutrient intake by arm was estimated using mixed-level regression models.
resultsA total of 282 mothers participated (n = 140 intervention arm and 142 standard of care (SoC) arm). The mean daily intakes of energy and lipid fed to infants were 505 kcal/day (SD = 225.9) and 13 g/day (SD = 6.9), respectively, in the intervention and SoC arms, with no difference between arms. Intervention infants consumed slightly more protein than SoC infants (13.7 v. 12.3 g/day,
conclusionsAt the midpoint of the MMT, energy, lipid, and micronutrient intake did not differ between arms. Protein consumption was slightly greater in the intervention arm. Guided by the trial's program theory, this analysis advances the interpretation of the MMT trial findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.