ArticleNutrients2024
Gut Microbiota Interacts with Dietary Habits in Screenings for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and experimental validation of CD74, PGLYRP1, and TXN as potential biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis: an integrative bulk and ScRNA-seq study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Advances in the role of baicalin and baicalein in colon cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Integrative bulk and single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal integrated stress response-related biomarkers in periodontitis with experimental validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesGut microbiota interacts with nutrients, which may be relevant to assigning a microbial signature to colorectal cancer (CRC). We aim to evaluate the potential of gut microbiota combined with dietary habits in the early detection of pathological findings related to CRC in the course of a screening program. METHODOLOGY: The colonoscopy performed on 152 subjects positive for fecal occult blood test showed that 6 subjects had adenocarcinoma, 123 had polyps, and 23 subjects had no pathological findings. Gut microbiota was analyzed by 16S metagenomic. Caret package was used to build the classification models in R.
resultsRandom forest (RF) classifier models were used to test the potential of gut microbiota alone or combined with dietary habits as a biomarker to discern between individuals with CRC-related lesions (polyps or adenocarcinoma) versus individuals without pathological findings. RF classifier models yielded an area under the curve of 0.790 using gut microbiota data, 0.710 using dietary habits data, and 0.804 in the combined model including gut microbiota and dietary habits data. The abundance of
conclusionsOur results suggest that the interaction between gut microbiota and dietary habits is relevant when a microbial signature is used as a marker in CRC. Moreover, gut microbiota signature and information about the dietary habits of the individuals seem to be important for improving screening programs for the early detection of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.