Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796193›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Antimicrobial Activity of

Natalia Markelova, Anastasia Chumak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Potato (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. An EndophyticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Biotechnological Potential of RhizosphericInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Combined Application of Chitosan-InducedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Advances in the Control of Plant Fungal Pathogens.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia MarkelovaGause Institute of New Antibiotics, ul. Bolshaya Pirogovskaya, 11, Moscow 119021, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-721X
Anastasia ChumakGause Institute of New Antibiotics, ul. Bolshaya Pirogovskaya, 11, Moscow 119021, Russia.ORCID 0009-0001-6715-8166

Funding

Gause Institute of New Antibiotics Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BacillusLipopeptidesPeptides, CyclicLipopeptidesPeptides, Cyclicadaptive responseantimicrobial activitycell differentiationcyclic lipopeptidesgenus Bacillus

Identifiers

PMID39796193
PMCPMC11720072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.