ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
EML4-ALK: Update on ALK Inhibitors.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes of ALK inhibitors in metastaticTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with resectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboringTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- The progress of biomarkers detection to lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Analysis of clinical features and outcomes in a Chinese cohort withFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous evaluation of EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 in lung adenocarcinomas: the largest single-center experience from southern Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Prognostic analysis and development of a prognostic model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer patients treated with ALK-TKIs.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies of ALK-Positive Lung Cancer: A Beginner's Guide for Patients, Their Families and Carers.Thoracic cancer · 2025Review
- Refining Criteria for Choosing the First-Line Treatment for Real-World Patients with AdvancedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Treatment of metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: indirect comparison of different ALK inhibitors using reconstructed patient data.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the discovery of the first-generation ALK inhibitor, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective in the first line or further lines of treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EMLA4-ALK translocation. This review traces the main milestones in the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic patients and the survival outcomes in the first-line and second-line settings with different ALK inhibitors. It presents the two options available for first-line treatment at the present time: sequencing different ALK inhibitors versus using the most potent inhibitor in front-line treatment. The efficacy outcomes of different ALK inhibitors in the first-line setting; the molecular profile of the disease, including mutation resistances and ALK variants and co-mutations; and patients' co-morbidities and inhibitor toxicities should be taken into account to address the choice of the first-line treatment, as suggested in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.