ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Cellular Response of Immune Cells in the Upper Respiratory Tract After Treatment with Cold Atmospheric Plasma In Vitro.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A dual-index framework for cold atmospheric plasma dosing: A meta-analysis of parametric control from volumetric redox flux to redox homeostatic status.Redox biology · 2026Pooled it
- Possible Applications of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Otorhinolaryngology: A Narrative Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Data Management Workflow for FAIR Sharing of Bioimaging Datasets in Plasma Medicine.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Modulation of cellular signaling and innate immune mechanisms by cold atmospheric plasma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- In Vivo Immune Cell Responses and Long-Term Effects of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in the Upper Respiratory Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has antimicrobial properties and is also known to stimulate the immune system. These properties could be useful for the development of a novel therapeutic or preventive strategy against respiratory infections in the upper respiratory tract (URT) such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) without inducing an immune overreaction. This study investigated the cellular responses of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) after exposure to CAP in a three-dimensional (3D) model of the URT. In vitro experiments were conducted using PMNs isolated from human blood to assess cell migration, intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), NETosis, surface marker expression (CD11b, CD62L, and CD66b), and cell death with live cell imaging and flow cytometry. CAP was applied for 5 min using two distinct modalities: pressurized air plasma with a plasma intensive care (PIC) device and nebulized air plasma (NP) with a new humidity resistent surface microdischarge (SMD) plasma source, both developed by Terraplasma Medical GmbH. There were no significant signs of cell damage or overstimulation with either device under the conditions tested. However, the NP device caused milder effects on PMN functionality compared to the PIC device, but also demonstrated reduced antibacterial efficacy and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (RONS) production, as analyzed with colorimetric/fluorimetric assay kits. These findings highlight a trade-off between the two CAP modalities, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Further studies are necessary to investigate these effects in the clinical setting and evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CAP treatment in the URT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.