Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796112›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

The Significance of the Response: Beyond the Mechanics of DNA Damage and Repair-Physiological, Genetic, and Systemic Aspects of Radiosensitivity in Higher Organisms.

Peter V Ostoich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The highly expressedJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter V OstoichInstitute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical radiation biology as we understand it clearly identifies genomic DNA as the primary target of ionizing radiation. The evidence appears rock-solid: ionizing radiation typically induces DSBs with a yield of ~30 per cell per Gy, and unrepaired DSBs are a very cytotoxic lesion. We know very well the kinetics of induction and repair of different types of DNA damage in different organisms and cell lines. And yet, higher organisms differ in their radiation sensitivity-humans can be unpredictably radiosensitive during radiotherapy; this can be due to genetic defects (e.g., ataxia telangiectasia (AT), Fanconi anemia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS), and the xeroderma pigmentosum spectrum, among others) but most often is unexplained. Among other mammals, goats (

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairRadiation ToleranceAnimalsHumansRadiation, Ionizingcomparative geneticsDNA damage and repairgenetic disordersimmunomodulationmutationradiobiologyradiosensitivitysignaling

Identifiers

PMID39796112
PMCPMC11719969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.