ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
An Overview of the Current State of Cell Viability Assessment Methods Using OECD Classification.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Antidiabetic Effects of Anthocyanins on Pancreatic β-Cell Function: A Systematic Review ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Crude Plant Extracts and Their Anti-Inflammatory Potential in Oral Inflammatory Cell Models: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Protein Modifications for Cellular Protein Delivery.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Functional Parameters of Hybridoma Cells: Methods of Evaluation and Biotechnological Relevance.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of oxime β-lapachone in human cancer cells: selectivity toward NCI-H460 and insights from molecular docking.Human cell · 2026Article
- Development of Wedelia (Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation-induced Differentiation of Adipose-derived Stem Cells into Neuronal Organoid-like Structures.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Frog Skin Peptides: Nature's Dual-Action Weapons Against Infection and Cancer.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In situ detection of dead cells from live cells via a DC plus low frequency AC resistive pulse sensor.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Article
- An AOP-guidedNAM journal · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review on bacterial endophytic secondary metabolites: a road map from crude extract to lead molecule production.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- The antioxidant, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, affects beta cell oxidative stress, insulin secretion, and intracellular signaling pathways in MIN6 cells.Cell and tissue research · 2025Article
- EGFR-Targeted Photodynamic Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines Using Porphyrin-Peptide Conjugates: Synthesis and Mechanistic Insight.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Arctigenin Attenuates Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation via Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation (ERAD)-Mediated Restoration of Lipid Homeostasis.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Article
- Drug Repurposing of Voglibose, a Diabetes Medication for Skin Health.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biological effects of two nano-composite resins on human gingival fibroblast (anJournal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past century, numerous methods for assessing cell viability have been developed, and there are many different ways to categorize these methods accordingly. We have chosen to use the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) classification due to its regulatory importance. The OECD categorizes these methods into four groups: non-invasive cell structure damage, invasive cell structure damage, cell growth, and cellular metabolism. Despite the variety of cell viability methods available, they can all be categorized within these four groups, except for two novel methods based on the cell membrane potential, which we added to the list. Each method operates on different principles and has its own advantages and disadvantages, making it essential for researchers to choose the method that best fits their experimental design. This review aims to assist researchers in making this decision by describing these methods regarding their potential use and providing direct references to the cell viability assessment methods. Additionally, we use the OECD classification to facilitate potential regulatory use and to highlight the need for adding a new category to their list.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.