SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
The Role of GFAP in Post-Mortem Analysis of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurovascular and inflammatory effects of biperiden in the acute phase of moderate traumatic brain injury: evidence from a non-human primate model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-dimensional plasma proteomic profiling elucidates molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological networks in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- N-Stearidonoylethanolamine Restores CA1 Synaptic Integrity and Reduces Astrocytic Reactivity After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, particularly in forensic settings where determining the cause of death and timing of injury is critical. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a biomarker specific to astrocytes, has emerged as a valuable tool in post-mortem analyses of TBI. A PRISMA-based literature search included studies examining GFAP in human post-mortem samples such as brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, and urine. The results highlight that GFAP levels correlate with the severity of brain injury, survival interval, and pathological processes such as astrocyte damage and blood-brain barrier disruption. Immunohistochemistry, ELISA, and molecular techniques were commonly employed for GFAP analysis, with notable variability in protocols and thresholds among studies. GFAP demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing TBI-related deaths from other causes, particularly when analyzed in CSF and serum. Furthermore, emerging evidence supports its role in complementing other biomarkers, such as S100B and NFL, to improve diagnostic precision. However, the review also identifies significant methodological heterogeneity and gaps in standardization, which limit the generalizability of findings. Future research should focus on establishing standardized protocols, exploring biomarker combinations, and utilizing advanced molecular tools to enhance the forensic application of GFAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.