ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Clustering Algorithm-Driven Detection of TRBC1-Restricted Clonal T-Cell Populations Produces Better Results than Manual Gating Analysis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flow cytometric (FC) immunophenotyping and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement studies are essential ancillary methods for the characterisation of T-cell lymphomas. Traditional manual gating and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analyses can be labour-intensive, operator-dependent, and have limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The objective of our study was to investigate the efficacy of the Phenograph and t-SNE algorithms together with an antibody specific for the TCR β-chain constant region 1 (TRBC1) to identify monoclonal T-cell populations. FC- and PCR-based clonality analyses were performed on 275 samples of T-cell lymphomas, B-cell lymphomas, and reactive lymphocytic proliferations. Monotypic T-cell populations were identified in 65.1% of samples by manual gating and 72.4% by algorithm-driven analysis, while PCR-based analysis detected clonal T cells in 68.0%. Of the 262 monotypic populations identified, 46.6% were classified as T-cell lymphomas and 53.4% as T-cell populations of uncertain significance (T-CUS). Algorithm-driven gating identified monotypic populations that were overlooked by manual gating or PCR-based methods. The study highlights the difficulty in distinguishing monotypic populations as T-cell lymphoma or T-CUS. Further research is needed to establish criteria for distinguishing between these populations and to improve FC diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.