ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Optimized Prime Editing of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Efficiently Generate Isogenic Models of Mendelian Diseases.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- CRISPR-Cas9 and precision editing technologies linking functional genomics to clinical translation in genetic diseases.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-based repair of a heterozygous HNF1A mutation in patient-derived hiPSCs.Human genetics · 2026Article
- Prime editing for the investigation of aberrant splicing defect associated with a pathogenicMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Clinical translation of human iPSC technologies: advances, safety concerns, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prime editing (PE) is a CRISPR-based tool for genome engineering that can be applied to generate human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based disease models. PE technology safely introduces point mutations, small insertions, and deletions (indels) into the genome. It uses a Cas9-nickase (nCas9) fused to a reverse transcriptase (RT) as an editor and a PE guide RNA (pegRNA), which introduces the desired edit with great precision without creating double-strand breaks (DSBs). PE leads to minimal off-targets or indels when introducing single-strand breaks (SSB) in the DNA. Low efficiency can be an obstacle to its use in hiPSCs, especially when the genetic context precludes the screening of multiple pegRNAs, and other strategies must be employed to achieve the desired edit. We developed a PE platform to efficiently generate isogenic models of Mendelian disorders. We introduced the c.25G>A (p.V9M) mutation in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.