ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Compare Analysis of Codon Usage Bias of Nuclear Genome in Eight Sapindaceae Species.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Pan-Plastome of Walnuts (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Characterization ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolution and Functional Implications of Codon Usage Bias in Eukaryotes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analyses ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Codon usage bias (CUB) refers to the different frequencies with which various codons are utilized within a genome. Examining CUB is essential for understanding genome structure, function, and evolution. However, little was known about codon usage patterns and the factors influencing the nuclear genomes of eight ecologically significant Sapindaceae species widely utilized for food and medicine. In this study, an analysis of nucleotide composition revealed a higher A/T content and showed a preference for A/T at the third codon position in the eight species of Sapindaceae. A correspondence analysis of relative synonymous codon usage explained only part of the variation, suggesting that not only natural selection but also various other factors contribute to selective constraints on codon bias in the nuclear genomes of the eight Sapindaceae species. Additionally, ENC-GC3 plot, PR2-Bias, and neutrality plot analyses indicated that natural selection exerted a greater influence than mutation pressure across these eight species. Among the eight Sapindaceae species, 16 to 26 optimal codons were identified, with two common high-frequency codons: AGA (encoding Arg) and GCU (encoding Ala). The clustering heat map, which included the 8 Sapindaceae species and 13 other species, revealed two distinct clusters corresponding to monocots and dicots. This finding suggested that CUB analysis was particularly effective in elucidating evolutionary relationships at the family level. Collectively, our results emphasized the distinct codon usage characteristics and unique evolutionary traits of the eight Sapindaceae species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.