ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Click Chemistry as an Efficient Toolbox for Coupling Sterically Hindered Molecular Systems to Obtain Advanced Materials for Nanomedicine.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthogonal Triple-Click Synthesis of Heteromimetic Triglycosylated Fullerenes.Organic letters · 2026Article
- Chitosan Derivatives: Challenges and Opportunities in the Green and Sustainable Transition Era.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeted Protein Degradation in Cancer: PROTACs, New Targets, and Clinical Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Linker-Engineered Tyrosine-Azide Coatings for Stable Strain-Promoted Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition (SPAAC) Functionalization.Polymers · 2025Article
- Hydrogels from Renewable Resources: Advances in 3D Networks Based on Cellulose and Hemicellulose.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since its conceptualization, click chemistry in all its variants has proven to be a superior synthesis protocol, compared to conventional methods, for forming new covalent bonds under mild conditions, orthogonally, and with high yields. If a term like reactive resilience could be established, click reactions would be good examples, as they perform better under increasingly challenging conditions. Particularly, highly hindered couplings that perform poorly with conventional chemistry protocols-such as those used to conjugate biomacromolecules (e.g., proteins and aptamers) or multiple drugs onto macromolecular platforms-can be more easily achieved using click chemistry principles, while also promoting high stereoselectivity in the products. In this review, three molecular platforms relevant in the field of nanomedicine are considered: polymers/copolymers, cyclodextrins, and fullerenes, whose functionalization poses a challenge due to steric hindrance, either from the intrinsic bulk behavior (as in polymers) or from the proximity of confined reactive sites, as seen in cyclodextrins and fullerenes. Their functionalization with biologically active groups (drugs or biomolecules), primarily through copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) and thiol-ene click reactions, has led to the development of increasingly sophisticated systems with enhanced specificity, multifunctionality, bioavailability, delayed clearance, multi-targeting, selective cytotoxicity, and tracking capabilities-all essential in the field of nanomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.