ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Investigation of the Indentation Elastic Modulus for Metal Films on Flexible Substrates Considering the Substrate Effect.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A label-free membrane-based biosensor array with AuNP-modified PDMS for sensitive and specific detection of alpha-fetoprotein.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate measurement of the elastic modulus of thin metal films on flexible substrates is critical for understanding the mechanical reliability of flexible electronics. However, conventional methods, such as the Oliver-Pharr model, often underestimate the modulus due to substrate effects, particularly with low-modulus substrates like polyimide (PI). In this study, we propose an improved weighting model that replaces the empirical weighting factor with a variable X to better account for substrate contributions. Nanoindentation experiments were performed on Cu and Al films with thicknesses of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 μm, deposited on PI and silicon substrates. The results show a significant underestimation of the elastic modulus when traditional methods were applied, especially on PI substrates, where values decreased by up to 95%. Using the proposed X-based model, the corrected elastic modulus aligned with the inherent properties of the films, with errors reduced to within 2%. A finite element analysis (FEA) validated the stress and displacement distributions, demonstrating the substrate's influence on indentation behavior. This study provides a robust framework for accurately measuring the elastic modulus of thin films on flexible substrates, paving the way for a more reliable mechanical characterization in flexible electronics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.