ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Investigation of Basic Assumption for Contact Between Spheric Asperities in Rough Surface.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate analyses of contact problems for rough surfaces are important but complicated. Some assumptions, namely that all asperities can be approximated by a hemisphere with the same radius and assuming a Gaussian distribution of the asperity heights, are convenient but may lead to less accurate results. The purpose of this work is to investigate these assumptions and analyze the conditions under which they are valid. The finite element method is used to construct spherical asperity contact models with different radii and materials. The validity of the assumptions is assessed by comparatively analyzing the results of four models in terms of contact loads, contact radii, and average contact pressures under different yield strengths. The results show that these assumptions are fully applicable under elastic deformation. For plastic cases, the lower yield strength of the two contacting bodies is the dominant factor affecting the contact results. Assuming the same lower yield strength, the ratio of the yield strengths of two spheres has an influence on contact characteristics in the range from 1.2 to 3, but a negligible influence when the ratio is greater than 3. With an equivalent yield strength and yield ratio, the plastic contact of asperities can be analyzed in detail, which be conducive to clarifying the application scope of the above assumption. The work reported in this study provides some theoretical basis for an accurate contact model of rough surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.