ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Application of Machine Learning to the Prediction of Surface Roughness in the Milling Process on the Basis of Sensor Signals.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forming Technologies and Mechanical Properties of Advanced Materials-Second Edition.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Epoxy Adhesive Materials as Protective Coatings: Strength Property Analysis Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents an investigation of the use of machine learning methodologies for the prediction of surface roughness in milling operations, using sensor data as the primary source of information. The sensors, which included current transformers, a microphone, and displacement sensors, captured comprehensive machining signals at a frequency of 10 kHz. The signals were subjected to preprocessing using the Savitzky-Golay filter, with the objective of isolating relevant moments of active material machining and reducing noise. Two machine learning models, namely Elastic Net and neural networks, were employed for the prediction purposes. The Elastic Net model demonstrated effective handling of multicollinearity and reduction in the data dimensionality, while the neural networks, utilizing the ReLU activation function, exhibited the capacity to capture complex, nonlinear patterns. The models were evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), which yielded values of 0.94 for Elastic Net and 0.95 for neural networks, indicating a high degree of predictive accuracy. These findings illustrate the potential of machine learning to optimize manufacturing processes by facilitating precise predictions of surface roughness. Elastic Net demonstrated its utility in reducing dimensionality and selecting features, while neural networks proved effective in modeling complex data. Consequently, these methods exemplify the efficacy of integrating data-driven approaches with robust predictive models to improve the quality and efficiency of surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.