Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39795741›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Design Optimization of the Mechanics of a Metamaterial-Based Prosthetic Foot.

Agata Mrozek-Czajkowska, Tomasz Stręk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agata Mrozek-CzajkowskaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 Street, 61-138 Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz StrękFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 Street, 61-138 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2411-8236

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland) 0612/SBAD/3627, 0612/SBAD/3628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the analysis of a foot prosthesis optimization process, with a particular focus on the application of optimization algorithms and unconventional materials, such as auxetic materials. The study aims to enhance prosthesis performance by minimizing the difference between the ground reaction force generated by the prosthetic foot and that of a natural limb. In the initial part of the study, the basic topics concerning the parameterization of the foot prosthesis geometry and the preparation of a finite element model for human gait are discussed. In the subsequent part of the study, the focus is on the optimization process, in which algorithms were applied to adjust the prosthesis structure to the patient's individual needs. The optimization process utilized a finite element method gait model. After validating the FEM, an algorithm generating the prosthesis geometry based on the given parameters was developed. These parameters were optimized using the VOA, comparing FEM gait model data on vertical ground reaction force with experimental results. The results of the foot prosthesis optimization are presented through a comparison of different structural models. The study also demonstrates the application of auxetic materials, which, due to their unique mechanical properties, can enhance foot prosthesis efficiency. Simulations were performed using multi-material topology optimization. The results obtained for different gait phases were compared.

Indexed as

auxeticsfoot prosthesismetamaterialsoptimizationvirus optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID39795741
PMCPMC11721499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.