Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39795654›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Influence of Mineral Additives on Aggregate Reactivity.

Grzegorz Rogojsz, Tomasz Rudnicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grzegorz RogojszFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 2 Gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego Str., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-2007
Tomasz RudnickiFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 2 Gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego Str., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-2750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, the authors present the results of their research on assessing the effect of selected mineral additives on the alkaline reactivity of aggregates. The main objective of this research was to check whether the reactivity of aggregates that do not meet the standard requirements can be reduced. Due to the decreasing availability of crushed aggregates and the decreasing resources of sand used for cement concrete road surfaces, solutions should be sought that allow the use of lower-grade aggregates. Among the available mineral additives, dense microsilica, white microsilica, limestone flour, glass flour, basalt flour, and glass granulate were selected. Laboratory tests were carried out in accordance with the requirements for testing the alkaline reactivity of road aggregates in NaOH solution applicable in Poland. The tests included the use of mineral additives in the amounts of 10% and 20%. Based on the research conducted, it was observed that the most beneficial effect was obtained with the addition of white microsilica, for which a decrease in aggregate reactivity was observed by 76.7% for 10% of the additive and 95.8% for 20% of the content. The least beneficial effect, on the other hand, was the use of compacted microsilica, for which an increase in alkaline reactivity was observed by 9.3% for 10% of the additive and 20.9% for 20% of the additive. The research conducted shows that the alkaline reactivity of the aggregate can be reduced, due to which it is possible to use reactive aggregates for the construction of road surfaces made of cement concrete.

Indexed as

alkaline reactivitymineral additivesstandard mortar

Identifiers

PMID39795654
PMCPMC11721009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.