ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Influence of Mineral Additives on Aggregate Reactivity.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Dry and Water-Slurry Dosing of Different Silica Fumes on the Mechanical Properties of Standard Mortar.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Influence of Low-Emission Mineral Additives as a Substitute for CEM II and CEM III Cement on the Properties of Cement Mortars.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Functional Cement-Based Composites Materials for Future Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, the authors present the results of their research on assessing the effect of selected mineral additives on the alkaline reactivity of aggregates. The main objective of this research was to check whether the reactivity of aggregates that do not meet the standard requirements can be reduced. Due to the decreasing availability of crushed aggregates and the decreasing resources of sand used for cement concrete road surfaces, solutions should be sought that allow the use of lower-grade aggregates. Among the available mineral additives, dense microsilica, white microsilica, limestone flour, glass flour, basalt flour, and glass granulate were selected. Laboratory tests were carried out in accordance with the requirements for testing the alkaline reactivity of road aggregates in NaOH solution applicable in Poland. The tests included the use of mineral additives in the amounts of 10% and 20%. Based on the research conducted, it was observed that the most beneficial effect was obtained with the addition of white microsilica, for which a decrease in aggregate reactivity was observed by 76.7% for 10% of the additive and 95.8% for 20% of the content. The least beneficial effect, on the other hand, was the use of compacted microsilica, for which an increase in alkaline reactivity was observed by 9.3% for 10% of the additive and 20.9% for 20% of the additive. The research conducted shows that the alkaline reactivity of the aggregate can be reduced, due to which it is possible to use reactive aggregates for the construction of road surfaces made of cement concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.