Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39795646›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Sensitivity Analysis and Influence Evaluation of Progressive Wall Thickness of Honeycomb Structures as Energy Absorber Produced by Additive Technology Multi-Jet Fusion.

Tomas Kalina, Zdenek Chval, Frantisek Sedlacek, Stanislav Spirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomas KalinaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1692-8762
Zdenek ChvalFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6751-559X
Frantisek SedlacekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-149X
Stanislav SpirkFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Funding

University of West Bohemia SGS-2022-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of polymeric cell structures for the production of energy absorbers and to focus on the geometric optimization of polymeric cell structures producible by additive technologies to achieve the required deformation characteristics, high material efficiency and the low weight of the resulting absorber. A detailed analysis of different types of cell structures (different lattice structures and honeycombs) and their properties was performed. Honeycombs, which have been further examined in more detail, are best suited for absorbing large amounts of energy and high levels of material efficiency at known load directions. Honeycombs have the potential to absorb large amounts of energy relative to their low weight and their deformation characteristics have a relatively constant course. Honeycombs have the major disadvantage of an initial peak. However, this peak can be removed by appropriately adjusting the geometry of the honeycomb. Thanks to the possibilities that additive technology allows us, honeycombs with progressive wall thickness have been designed and researched. The output of this study is a detailed analysis of the properties and several design recommendations for the design of a honeycomb with a progressive wall thickness to achieve the required properties.

Indexed as

cellular structuresenergy absorberexplicit solverhoneycombslattice structures

Identifiers

PMID39795646
PMCPMC11722139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.