ArticlePolymers2025
Investigation of the Sensitivity of Acoustic Emission to the Differentiation Between Mode I, II, and III Fracture in Bulk Polymer Materials.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is very limited research in the literature investigating the way acoustic emission signals change when polymer materials are undergoing different fracture modes. This study investigates the capability of acoustic emission to recognize the fracture mode through acoustic emission parameter analysis, and can be considered the first-ever study which examines the impact of different loading conditions, i.e., fracture mode I, mode II, and mode III, on the acoustic emission parameters in polymer materials. To accomplish this, prism-like pre-cracked polymer specimens were tested under the three different fracture modes. Acoustic emission parameters appeared sensitive to the different loading conditions of the pre-cracked specimens, indicating that acoustic emission can be used to distinguish the three fracture modes in polymer materials. Both frequency and time parameters reflect changes in the stress states at the crack tip. The duration and rise time of the waveforms were found to be the most sensitive acoustic emission parameters for identifying the fracture mode, while the average frequency variation can be employed to differentiate between in-plane and out-of-plane fracture modes. In order to interpret the experimental results in relation to wave mechanics, numerical wave propagation simulations for longitudinal and shear excitations were performed to simulate tensile and shear fracture modes and the corresponding emitted waves. An interesting correlation between the experimental and numerical results exists, showcasing acoustic emission's potential for fracture identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.