ArticlePolymers2025
Selection of Network Parameters in Direct ANN Modeling of Roughness Obtained in FFF Processes.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial neural network (ANN) models have been used in the past to model surface roughness in manufacturing processes. Specifically, different parameters influence surface roughness in fused filament fabrication (FFF) processes. In addition, the characteristics of the networks have a direct impact on the performance of the models. In this work, a study about the use of ANN to model surface roughness in FFF processes is presented. The main objective of the paper is discovering how key ANN parameters (specifically, the number of neurons, the training algorithm, and the percentage of training and validation datasets) affect the accuracy of surface roughness predictions. To address this question, 125 3D printing experiments were conducted changing orientation angle, layer height and printing temperature, and measuring average roughness Ra as response. A multilayer perceptron neural network model with backpropagation algorithm was used. The study evaluates the effect of three ANN parameters: (1) number of neurons in the hidden layer (4, 5, 6 or 7), (2) training algorithm (Levenberg-Marquardt, Resilient Backpropagation or Scaled Conjugate Gradient), and (3) data splitting ratios (70%-15%-15% vs. 55%-15%-30%). Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was used as the performance metric. The Resilient Backpropagation algorithm, 7 neurons, and using 55% of training data yielded the best predictive performance, minimizing the MAE. Additionally, the impact of the dataset size on prediction accuracy was analysed. It was observed that the performance of the ANN gets worse as the number of datasets is reduced, emphasizing the importance of having sufficient data. This study will help to select appropriate values for the printing parameters in FFF processes, as well as to define the characteristics of the ANN to be used to model surface roughness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.