Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39795504›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Comparison of the Influence of Polypropylene (PP) or Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT)-Based Meltblown and Polyester/Polyamide-Based Hydroentangled Inner Layers on the Sound and Thermal Insulation Properties of Layered Nonwoven Composite Structures.

Emel Çinçik, Süreyya Kocatepe, Eda Aslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emel ÇinçikDepartment of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Türkiye.
Süreyya KocatepeDepartment of Textile, Clothing, Shoes and Leather, Firat University, 23300 Elazığ, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8084-0699
Eda AslanDepartment of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Türkiye.

Funding

Erciyes University FHD-2022-12093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal and sound insulation play a vital role in today's world, and nonwoven composite structures including microfiber layers provide efficient solutions for addressing these demands. In this study, the sound and thermal insulation properties of nonwoven composite structures, including single-layer meltblown, multilayer meltblown, hydroentangled, and nanofiber nonwoven inner layers, were compared statistically by using Design Expert 13 software. The inner layer type and outer layer type of the composite structures were considered as independent variables, and thickness, bulk density, air permeability, sound absorption coefficient, and thermal resistance of composite structures were evaluated as dependent variables during statistical analyses. The effects of layer types on dependent variables were investigated comparatively, and the best inner and outer layers for high sound and thermal insulation were determined. It was concluded that the developed nonwoven composites including hydroentangled and three-layered meltblown layers demonstrated superior sound absorption properties at low (changing between 48% and 70%) and moderate (ranging between 77% and 96%) sound frequencies, respectively, when compared to composites and materials including single-layer meltblown or nanofiber nonwoven structures reported in prior studies. Additionally, it can be inferred that the composite structures obtained in this study exhibited thermal resistance properties (0.49 to 0.73 m

Indexed as

heat insulationhydroentangled nonwovensmeltblown nonwovenssound insulation

Identifiers

PMID39795504
PMCPMC11722786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.