ArticlePolymers2024
Differences in Rejuvenation Mechanisms and Physical Properties of Aged Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS)-Modified Bitumen by Mono-Epoxy and Di-Epoxy Compounds.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Mechanistic Insights into the Aging and Regeneration of SBS-Modified Asphalt Under Coastal Humid-Hot Environmental Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A magnetic MOFs-based multifunctional molecularly imprinted fluorescence nanosensor for ultra-rapid and sensitive detection of tetracycline in food.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Recent Advancements in Non-surgical Approaches for the Management of Delayed Union and Nonunion in Long Bone Fractures of the Extremities: A Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Influence of Mineral Powder Content and Gradation on the Aging and High-Temperature Rheological Properties of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS) Modified Asphalt.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studying the mechanisms and effects of rejuvenators on SBS-modified bitumen is crucial for repairing degraded SBS and recycling aged SBS-modified bitumen (ASMB), thereby contributing to the sustainable development of bitumen pavements. This research examines the roles of mono-epoxy Alkyl (C12-C14) glycidyl ether (AGE) and di-epoxy 1,6-Hexanediol diglycidyl ether (HDE) under the catalysis of N,N-dimethyl benzyl amine (BDMA) in repairing degraded SBS chains. Aromatic oil (ORSMB)-, AGE-aromatic oil (ARSMB)-, and HDE-aromatic oil (HRSMB)-rejuvenated bitumen are analyzed for their chemical structures, physical properties, and rheological properties. Fluorescence microscopy (FM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) reveal that HDE chemically reconnects degraded SBS chains, enhancing ASMB properties, while AGE improves ASMB properties through physical softening. HDE balances high-temperature properties and improves mid-temperature fatigue resistance through a rigid repair effect and flexible chain structure. AGE enhances mid-temperature fatigue resistance but significantly reduces high-temperature rutting resistance due to a softening effect. The findings demonstrate that HDE restores ASMB ductility chemically, while AGE improves crack resistance through physical softening. These differences in rejuvenation mechanisms provide a theoretical basis for optimizing rejuvenator design and advancing bitumen pavement recycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.