Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39795450›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Analysis of Electrical Conductivity in Commercial Adhesives Incorporating Graphene Nanoplatelets for Industrial Applications.

Pablo Rodríguez Fernández, Cristina Alía García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo Rodríguez FernándezE.T.S. de Ingeniería y Diseño Industrial, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (España), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Alía GarcíaE.T.S. de Ingeniería y Diseño Industrial, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (España), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-0359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymers are often insulators, but this not a universal intrinsic characteristic of all polymers. For this work, the adhesives used, epoxy and polyurethane, do demonstrate this insulating characteristic. However, there has been significant interest in the development of conductive polymers, specifically adhesives, because of the potential properties and ease of processing of these polymers. The electrical-conductivity values for two composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were measured. Both matrices are intended for industrial usage. One composite used an epoxy matrix, while the other employed a polyurethane resin as the matrix. To achieve dispersion and exfoliation of the filler, the catalyst for each resin, mixed with the GNP in proportion, was subjected to an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The molds were filled by gravity, with the polyurethane specimens leveled to improve surface finish. The two-point uniaxial method was used to measure the conductivity of the specimens at room temperature, both before and after annealing at 120 °C for 120 min. Conductivity values were obtained for all samples, showing an increase after annealing; however, this increase was less pronounced compared to similar studies. The time and power in the ultrasonic bath, as well as the annealing conditions, must be optimized and the electrical conductivity should be studied periodically.

Indexed as

adhesivescompositeelectrical conductivityepoxyGNPsgraphene nanoplateletsmechanical propertiespercolationpolyurethanesonication

Identifiers

PMID39795450
PMCPMC11723301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.