ArticlePolymers2024
Multi-Parametric Optimization of 3D-Printed Components.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Additive Manufacturing Parameters and Surface Treatments on Wettability of VPP Acrylic Resins.Polymers · 2026Article
- Surface Quality and Compressive Properties of Mortise and Tenon Lattice Structures Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the experimental and theoretical optimization of process parameters to improve the quality of 3D-printed parts produced using the Fused Deposition Modeling technique. To ensure the cost-effective production of high-quality components, advancements in printing strategies are essential. This research identifies optimal 3D printing strategies to enhance the quality of finished products. Form and dimensional tolerances were assessed using a 3D Coordinate Measuring Machine, and the resulting data were analyzed via Design Expert software version 9.0.6.2. Design Expert for experimental design was utilized and an Analysis of Variance was conducted to validate the models' accuracy. The results indicate that a 45° raster angle, combined with internal raster values between 0.5048 and 0.726, minimizes flatness, cylindricity, and dimensional deviations by optimizing deposition patterns and thermal dynamics. Internal raster values below 0.308 resulted in insufficient support and greater deviations, while higher values enhanced stability through improved interlayer adhesion. Experimental validation confirmed these parameter settings as optimal for producing precise and consistent 3D-printed parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.