ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Experimental and Quantum Chemical Calculation Study on the Performance of Different Types of Ester Collectors.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ester collectors have rapidly developed into the main flotation collectors for copper sulfide minerals since they were developed. In this study, the collecting performance of four collectors, O-isopropyl-N-ethyl thionocarbamate ester (IPETC), 3-pentyl xanthate acrylate ester (PXA), O-isobutyl-N-allyl-thionocarbamate (IBALTC), and O-isobutyl-N-isobutoxycarbonyl-thionocarbamate (IBIBCTC), was investigated through microflotation tests, microcalorimetric measurements, and quantum chemical calculations. The results of the microflotation tests show that IBALTC and IPETC have stronger collecting abilities than IBIBCTC and PXA; the order of collecting ability is IBALTC > IPETC > IBIBCTC > PXA. The microcalorimetry test also shows that the adsorption heat of the former two is higher. Quantum chemical calculations show the energy difference between the HOMOs of the collector and the LUMOs of minerals. The electrostatic potential extremum around S atom and the first ionization potential of IPETC and IBALTC are similar and were smaller than IBIBCTC and PXA, which shows that the collecting ability of the former two is similar and stronger than the latter two. Among the collectors, the S atom polarizability, electrophilic, and nucleophilic attack index of IBALTC are the largest, indicating that its electronic deformation capability and nucleophilic properties are the strongest, which results in the strongest coordination interaction with the copper ions in copper sulfide minerals and thus the highest collecting ability. The S atom polarizability, electrophilic, and nucleophilic attack index of PXA are the smallest, indicating that its electronic deformation capability and nucleophilicity are the weakest, and its collecting ability is the weakest. The coordination between collector and mineral surface was analyzed theoretically. The research results are of great help to the design and development of ester collectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.