ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
The Impact of MSTN Gene Editing on Meat Quality and Metabolomics: A Comparative Study Among Three Breeds of MSTN-Edited and Non-Edited Cattle.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of meat: innovations in production within an expanding and sustainable food system.Food science of animal resources · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with growth, meat quality, and fatty acid metabolism in Sunit lambs under varying rearing conditions.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Efficient gene editing of BMP15, GDF9, and MSTN-but not the imprinted CLPG gene-in goat embryos via electrotransfection and handmade cloning.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Loss ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myostatin (MSTN) serves as a negative regulatory factor for muscle development. A reduction in MSTN gene expression can enhance muscle mass and increase meat production. However, whether it will impact meat quality traits remains one of the major concerns in the cattle breeding industry. To explore the meat quality traits of MSTN gene-edited cattle, this study compared the meat quality traits of three MSTN gene-edited cattle breeds with those of non-gene-edited cattle, including Luxi, Angus, and Mongolian cattle, and further conducted an analysis in combination with metabolomics. We found that MSTN gene-edited cattle were superior to non-gene-edited cattle in terms of meat pH, shear force, and intramuscular fat content. However, no significant differences were observed in water-holding capacity, water content, and protein content of the meat. Metabolomics analysis revealed three upregulated differential metabolites common to MSTN gene-edited and non-gene-edited cattle across three breeds, namely lactoyl-valine, 3-phenylactic acid, and lactoyl-methionine. Some studies have indicated that these metabolites can improve the meat's flavor. In this study, we compared the meat quality traits and metabolomics data between MSTN gene-edited and non-gene-edited cattle, and found that the meat quality of MSTN gene-edited cattle was superior to that of non-gene-edited cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.