Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794944›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Towards Automated Chicken Monitoring: Dataset and Machine Learning Methods for Visual, Noninvasive Reidentification.

Daria Kern, Tobias Schiele, Ulrich Klauck, Winfred Ingabire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daria KernFaculty Electronics & Computer Science, Aalen University, 73430 Aalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9828-1039
Tobias SchieleFaculty Electronics & Computer Science, Aalen University, 73430 Aalen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9627-0656
Ulrich KlauckFaculty Electronics & Computer Science, Aalen University, 73430 Aalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1675-5059
Winfred IngabireSchool of Computing, Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chicken is the world's most farmed animal. In this work, we introduce the Chicks4FreeID dataset, the first publicly available dataset focused on the reidentification of individual chickens. We begin by providing a comprehensive overview of the existing animal reidentification datasets. Next, we conduct closed-set reidentification experiments on the introduced dataset, using transformer-based feature extractors in combination with two different classifiers. We evaluate performance across domain transfer, supervised, and one-shot learning scenarios. The results demonstrate that transfer learning is particularly effective with limited data, and training from scratch is not necessarily advantageous even when sufficient data are available. Among the evaluated models, the vision transformer paired with a linear classifier achieves the highest performance, with a mean average precision of 97.0%, a top-1 accuracy of 95.1%, and a top-5 accuracy of 100.0%. Our evaluation suggests that the vision transformer architecture produces higher-quality embedding clusters than the Swin transformer architecture. All data and code are publicly shared under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechickencomputer visiondatasetindividual identificationlivestockmachine learningpoultryre-IDtransformer

Identifiers

PMID39794944
PMCPMC11718998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.