ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Towards Automated Chicken Monitoring: Dataset and Machine Learning Methods for Visual, Noninvasive Reidentification.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PIO, A Large-Scale Dataset for Broiler Chicken Detection under Real Poultry Farming Conditions.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Dual-Modal Chicken Mortality Detection Using Dynamic Hybrid Convolution-Based Feature Fusion.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- CF-DETR: A Lightweight Real-Time Model for Chicken Face Detection in High-Density Poultry Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chicken is the world's most farmed animal. In this work, we introduce the Chicks4FreeID dataset, the first publicly available dataset focused on the reidentification of individual chickens. We begin by providing a comprehensive overview of the existing animal reidentification datasets. Next, we conduct closed-set reidentification experiments on the introduced dataset, using transformer-based feature extractors in combination with two different classifiers. We evaluate performance across domain transfer, supervised, and one-shot learning scenarios. The results demonstrate that transfer learning is particularly effective with limited data, and training from scratch is not necessarily advantageous even when sufficient data are available. Among the evaluated models, the vision transformer paired with a linear classifier achieves the highest performance, with a mean average precision of 97.0%, a top-1 accuracy of 95.1%, and a top-5 accuracy of 100.0%. Our evaluation suggests that the vision transformer architecture produces higher-quality embedding clusters than the Swin transformer architecture. All data and code are publicly shared under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.