SynthesisJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024
Neuropsychiatric manifestations following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for cancer: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and management strategies.
Synthesis in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient preferences for treatment‑free intervals in multiple myeloma: mixed‑methods insights on monitoring trade‑offs and supportive care improvements.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- CAR T-Cell Therapy in Neurology: A Scoping Review of Neuro-Oncology, Autoimmune Diseases & Neurotoxicity.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Reassessing onco-exceptionalism: equity and resource allocation in immunotherapeutic cancer treatments.Journal of medical ethics · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy-associated dysgraphia as an early neurocognitive manifestation of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome: clinical characteristics, mechanistic insights, and assessment challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- [Management of side effects of CAR T cells].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Biology-driven therapies of CAR T immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has emerged as a transformative modality in the treatment of patients with cancer. However, it is increasingly evident that this therapeutic approach is not without its challenges. The unique nature of CAR-T cells as living drugs introduces a distinct set of side effects. As the application of CAR-T cell therapy expands to treat a broader range of diseases, it becomes increasingly important to devise effective strategies for handling the associated toxicities. Challenges in treating patients with CAR-T cells include addressing complications such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and cytopenias. This comprehensive review seeks to systematically identify, categorize and elucidate all previously described neurological and psychological side effects associated with CAR-T cell therapy, shedding light on the pertinent laboratory findings that underscore these phenomena.
methodsPubMed, Springer Link, and ScienceDirect were systematically searched for empirical studies on adult patients with cancer receiving CAR-T cell therapy for hemato-oncological malignancies. Quality assessment was conducted using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) for randomized trials and adherence to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist for observational studies. The synthesis of findings was conducted via a narrative approach, consolidating the diverse array of data into a coherent framework.
resultsFrom an initial pool of 2,276 citations, 546 studies met the inclusion criteria, exhibiting a rich tapestry of heterogeneity in terms of study characteristics and patient samples. The incidence of neuropsychological symptoms varied notably across different CAR-T cell products and hematological malignancies. Among the most frequently reported neuropsychological symptoms were aphasia, attention deficits, impaired consciousness, and disorientation, alongside a constellation of other symptoms including confusion, cognitive impairment, memory loss, writing difficulties, fatigue, headache, agitation, tremor, seizures, and psychomotor retardation. Early intervention strategies, including corticosteroids and tocilizumab, have shown the potential to reduce the intensity of neuropsychological symptoms and prevent their progression to critical complications.
conclusionThese insights underscore the imperative of extending neuropsychological assessments beyond the conventional Immune Effector Cell-Associated Encephalopathy score framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.