Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794918›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

FOGS: A SNPSTR Marker Database to Combat Wildlife Trafficking and a Cell Culture Bank for Ex-Situ Conservation.

Annika Mozer, Camilla Bruno Di-Nizo, Albia Consul, Bruno Huettel, Richard Jäger, Ayodélé Akintayo, Christoph Erhardt, Lena Fenner, Dominik Fischer, Sophia Forat and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biobanking biodiversity: recent strategies, challenges, and opportunities.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Annika MozerLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3676-7505
Camilla Bruno Di-NizoLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-5994
Albia ConsulLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Bruno HuettelMax-Planck-Genome-centre Cologne, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.
Richard JägerDepartment of Natural Sciences, Institute for Functional Gene Analytics, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, Rheinbach, Germany.
Ayodélé AkintayoLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph ErhardtLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Lena FennerLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Dominik FischerZoo Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-6705
Sophia ForatLabor für Forensische Analytik, Leverkusen, Germany.
France GimnichLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Peter GrobeLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Sebastian MartinLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Vikram NathanLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Ammar SaeedLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Laura von der MarkLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Christian WoehleMax-Planck-Genome-centre Cologne, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.
Klaus OlekLabor für Forensische Analytik, Leverkusen, Germany.
Bernhard MisofLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Jonas J AstrinLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-1162

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01LC1801A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illegal wildlife trade is a growing problem internationally. Poaching of animals not only leads to the extinction of populations and species but also has serious consequences for ecosystems and economies. This study introduces a molecular marker system that authorities can use to detect and substantiate wildlife trafficking. SNPSTR markers combine short tandem repeats with single nucleotide polymorphisms within an amplicon to increase discriminatory power. Within the FOGS (Forensic Genetics for Species Protection) project, we have established SNPSTR marker sets for 74 vertebrate species. On average, each set consists of 19 SNPSTR markers with 82 SNPs per set. More than 1300 SNPSTR markers and over 300 STR markers were identified. Also, through its biobanking pipeline, the FOGS project enabled the cryopreservation of somatic cells from 91 vertebrate species as well as viable tissues for later cell initiation from a further 109 species, providing future strategies for ex situ conservation. In addition, many more fixed tissues and DNA samples of endangered species were biobanked. Therefore, FOGS was an interdisciplinary study, combining molecular wildlife forensics and conservation tools. The SNPSTR sets and cell culture information are accessible through the FOGS database (https://fogs-portal.de/data) that is open to scientists, researchers, breeders and authorities worldwide to protect wildlife from illegal trade.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesDatabases, GeneticForensic GeneticsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBiological Specimen BanksEndangered SpeciesGenetic MarkersMicrosatellite RepeatsWildlife TradeGenetic Markersbiobankingcryopreservationdatabaseillegal wildlife tradeSNPSTRwildlife forensics

Identifiers

PMID39794918
PMCPMC11969641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.