ArticleBMC cancer2025
A novel machine learning-based immune prognostic signature for improving clinical outcomes and guiding therapy in colorectal cancer: an integrated bioinformatics and experimental study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methylation-Associated Differentiation Features Define Biological and Prognostic Heterogeneity in CMS4 Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Synergistic Profiling of Programmed Cell Death and Immune Responses Identifies a Novel Prognostic Index for Cervical Cancer.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Speeding Up the Discovery of Optimal Feature Combinations for Omics Data Based on Pseudo-Kernel Function.Research square · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- A Machine-Learning Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Using a Complement-Related Risk Signature.Oncology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune cells are pivotal components in the tumor microenvironment (TME), which can interact with tumor cells and significantly influence cancer progression and therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, classifying cancer patients based on the status of immune cells within the TME is increasingly recognized as an effective approach to identify prognostic biomarkers, paving the way for more effective and personalized cancer treatments. Considering the high incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC), in this study, an integrated machine learning survival framework incorporating 93 different algorithmic combinations was utilized to determine the optimal strategy for developing an immune-related prognostic signature (IRPS) based on the average C-index across the four CRC cohorts. Notably, IRPS was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for predicting the survival outcomes of CRC patients, showing superior performance compared to traditional clinical features and 63 published signatures in both training and validation cohorts. Furthermore, CRC patients classified in the low-risk group according to the IRPS showed higher sensitivity to immunotherapy than those in the high-risk group, suggesting that low-risk patients are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Through in silico screening of potential compounds, dasatinib, vinblastine, and YM-155 were identified as potential therapeutic agents for high-risk CRC patients. In vitro studies demonstrated that knockdown of APCDD1, a key component of the IRPS, inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of HT-29 cells and promoted their apoptosis. Thus, the IRPS serve as a powerful tool for predicting patient prognosis, immunotherapy response and candidate drugs, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making and treatment evaluation of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.