ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Optimization of antidepressant treatment by pharmacogenomics: a case report.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating CRISPR functional genomics with admixture-aware psychotropic pharmacogenetics in Brazil.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Brain Tumors, AI and Psychiatry: Predicting Tumor-Associated Psychiatric Syndromes with Machine Learning and Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew new psychiatric drugs have entered the market in recent decades; in contrast, the number of drugs carrying pharmacogenomic labels continues to increase. For the foreseeable future, the advancement of psychiatry and drug therapy may hinge on personalized treatment. Currently, antipsychotic or antidepressant choices rely heavily on the clinical experience of psychiatrists and potentially lengthy iterative trials. During these trials, the clinical response to treatment in acutely depressed patients can be assessed only after several weeks of exposure to the drug. Although pharmacogenomic testing has been used in clinical care for several years, most Chinese clinicians struggle to utilize the information accurately, resulting in expensive tests that provide little real benefit to patients. Here, we demonstrate how to combine the results of pharmacogenomic testing to develop an individualized treatment plan. Our goal is to find the optimal medication regimen and dosage for the patient in the shortest possible time, control symptoms as soon as possible, and predict adverse drug reactions. This approach aims to offer a practical therapeutic idea for clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 27-year-old female patient experiencing a relapse of depression. Despite previous attempts with empiric medication, her symptoms remained uncontrolled, leading to exacerbation and drug withdrawal reactions. Utilizing the results of pharmacogenetic testing, we crafted an individualized treatment plan, resulting in rapid remission without any adverse drug reactions.
conclusionRecognizing the complexity of antidepressant response, our patients aim to improve their understanding, as well as that of other healthcare providers, by undergoing pharmacogenomics testing. This enhances the credibility of their medication choices. While pharmacogenomics is just one aspect considered in selecting a treatment regimen for depression, it remains a valuable tool for increasing credibility and mitigating potential adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.