ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of free-breathing contrast-enhanced and unenhanced stack-of-spirals ultrashort echo time MRI for lung follow-up in patients with malignancies at 1.5T.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Thoracic MRI in Pediatric Oncology: Feasibility and Image Quality of Post-Contrast Free-Breathing Radial 3D T1 Weighted Imaging.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences-spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE).
methodsPatients were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and September 2022. All participants underwent both 3T MRI scanning, utilizing the radial VIBE sequence and spiral UTE sequence, as well as standard chest CT imaging. The CT and MRI examinations were conducted within a 7-day interval. Two radiologists assessed the image quality using a visual 5-point ordinal Likert scale, and pulmonary nodules identified on MRI were evaluated through comparison with CT as the reference standard.
resultsA total of 52 patients participated in this study, during which 82 pulmonary nodules were detected via CT imaging. The image quality scores for depicting pulmonary vasculature and airways using the spiral UTE sequence (4.61 ± 0.63; 4.76 ± 0.48) were significantly higher than those for the radial VIBE sequence (4.27 ± 0.87; 4.14 ± 0.82) (P < 0.05). However, for nodules smaller than 6 mm, the detection rate for the spiral UTE sequence (82.61%) was notably higher than that of the radial VIBE sequence (39.13%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the detection rate for ground-glass nodules was higher with the spiral UTE sequence (75.00%) compared to the radial VIBE sequence (17.86%) (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between radial VIBE and CT was 0.99 (P < 0.001), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between spiral UTE and CT was also 0.99 (P < 0.001).
conclusionThe spiral UTE sequence demonstrates superior capability in visualizing ground glass nodules, blood vessels, and airways. In cases where patients present with ground glass nodules, the spiral UTE sequence is the preferred choice. Conversely, when the nodules are solid or partially solid, it is advisable to opt for radial VIBE sequences that are time-efficient and exhibit fewer artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.