Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794715›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Not seeing the trees for the forest. The impact of neighbours on graph-based configurations in histopathology.

Olga Fourkioti, Matt De Vries, Reed Naidoo, Chris Bakal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olga FourkiotiThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. olga.fourkioti@icr.ac.uk.
Matt De VriesThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Reed NaidooThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Chris BakalThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. chris.bakal@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning (DL) has set new standards in cancer diagnosis, significantly enhancing the accuracy of automated classification of whole slide images (WSIs) derived from biopsied tissue samples. To enable DL models to process these large images, WSIs are typically divided into thousands of smaller tiles, each containing 10-50 cells. Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is a commonly used approach, where WSIs are treated as bags comprising numerous tiles (instances) and only bag-level labels are provided during training. The model learns from these broad labels to extract more detailed, instance-level insights. However, biopsied sections often exhibit high intra- and inter-phenotypic heterogeneity, presenting a significant challenge for classification. To address this, many graph-based methods have been proposed, where each WSI is represented as a graph with tiles as nodes and edges defined by specific spatial relationships.

resultsIn this study, we investigate how different graph configurations, varying in connectivity and neighborhood structure, affect the performance of MIL models. We developed a novel pipeline, K-MIL, to evaluate the impact of contextual information on cell classification performance. By incorporating neighboring tiles into the analysis, we examined whether contextual information improves or impairs the network's ability to identify patterns and features critical for accurate classification. Our experiments were conducted on two datasets: COLON cancer and UCSB datasets.

conclusionsOur results indicate that while incorporating more spatial context information generally improves model accuracy at both the bag and tile levels, the improvement at the tile level is not linear. In some instances, increasing spatial context leads to misclassification, suggesting that more context is not always beneficial. This finding highlights the need for careful consideration when incorporating spatial context information in digital pathology classification tasks.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAttentionCell classificationComputational pathologyContextGraph-neural networksVisualization

Identifiers

PMID39794715
PMCPMC11724494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.