ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Disposition of emergency department patients presenting with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cutaneous effects of antihypertensive drugs: A comprehensive narrative review of side effects, management, and prevention.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the most common cause of drug-induced angioedema in the United States. Our primary objective was to provide descriptive evidence regarding emergency department (ED) disposition of ACEI-induced angioedema patients. Our secondary objective was to evaluate unique patterns in those with ACEI-induced angioedema at a tertiary referral center, including demographics, details of those requiring intubation, length of inpatient stay, and allergy documentation.
methodsThis was a retrospective study evaluating all cases of ACEI-induced angioedema at a large, regional academic medical center. We performed a medical record review to identify patients with ACEI-induced angioedema who presented to the ED from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022. A structured data abstraction process was utilized to select patients of interest, followed by descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and odds ratios for categorical data, and Kruskal Wallis tests for continuous data.
resultsA total of 637 unique patient encounters met potential inclusion. After a substantial, standardized review, 94 patients met inclusion. During the study period, there were 94 patients presenting to the ED who were diagnosed as having angioedema secondary to an ACEI (90 patients) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (4 patients). Overall, 53 patients (56.38%) improved during their ED stay, and of those, 32 patients (60.38%) were discharged home. None of the 12 patients that worsened were sent home from the ED. Those who were discharged from the ED with a median stay of 4 h had no increased risk of return to the ED versus those who were admitted. The only treatment found to have statistical association with disposition was intramuscular epinephrine. Only 13 of 43 ED discharged patients (23.64%) had their ACEI/ARB documented in their allergy listings compared to 42 of 51 patients (76.36%) of admitted patients, odds ratio of failure to document was 0.0929 (95% CI, 0.0352 to 0.24512). Only one patient out of the total 94 returned to the ED due to recurrent angioedema symptoms during our study period and was subsequently discharged.
conclusionOur results indicated that at a large, tertiary care referral center, patients with ACEI-angioedema who did not exhibit severe symptoms were safely discharged home with low risk of early return visit to the ED. Severe symptoms were found to be any throat symptoms, voice change, drooling, worsening swelling, or complaints of dyspnea. Further, among those admitted, patients in our study had a short inpatient stay and were safely discharged with no documented early return visit to the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.