Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794703›Full record

SynthesisBMC nephrology2025

Effect of acute kidney injury care bundle on kidney outcomes in cardiac patients receiving critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fatma Refaat Ahmed, Nabeel Al-Yateem, Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi, Rawia Gamil, Mohannad Eid AbuRuz

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Impact of an Acute Kidney Injury Prevention Bundle in High-risk Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Single Center Before-After Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatma Refaat AhmedCollege of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE. fahmed@sharjah.ac.ae.
Nabeel Al-YateemCollege of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Seyed Aria NejadghaderiHIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. ariang20@gmail.com.
Rawia GamilCritical Care and Emergency Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mohannad Eid AbuRuzCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, MBRU, Dubai Health, Dubai, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac surgery is a major contributor to acute kidney injury (AKI); approximately 22% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery develop AKI, and among them, 2% will require renal replacement therapy (RRT). AKI is also associated with heightened risks of mortality and morbidity, longer intensive care stays, and increased treatment costs. Due to the challenges of treating AKI, prevention through the use of care bundles is suggested as an effective approach. This review aimed to assess the impact of care bundles on kidney outcomes, mortality, and hospital stay for cardiac patients in critical care.

methodsPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched up to November 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies on individuals with cardiac diseases receiving critical care, that used AKI care bundle as the intervention, and reported outcomes related to AKI, mortality, and other kidney-related events. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool 2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

resultsSeven studies on total 5045 subjects, including five observational and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The implementation of care bundles significantly reduced the incidence of all-stage AKI (OR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.61-0.99) and moderate-severe AKI (OR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.43-0.72). Also, the implementation of care bundle increased the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction after 30 days by 2.39 times. However, there were no significant changes in RRT, major adverse kidney events, or mortality between the groups. The mean quality assessment score for observational studies was 7.2 out of ten, while there were noted concerns in the risk of bias assessment of the RCTs.

conclusionsThe application of care bundles in patients, including those undergoing cardiac surgeries as well as non-cardiac critical illness, appears to be effective in reducing AKI, particularly in moderate and severe stages. However, given the inclusion of non-cardiac patients in some studies, the observed effect may not be solely attributable to cardiac surgery cases. Future large-scale RCTs focusing specifically on cardiac surgery patients are recommended to clarify the impact of care bundles within this subgroup. REGISTRATION ID IN PROSPERO: CRD42024498972.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCardiac Surgical ProceduresCritical CareHeart DiseasesPatient Care BundlesPostoperative ComplicationsHumansRenal Replacement TherapyAcute renal failureCardiac DiseaseCare BundleCritical careIntensive care unitMeta-analysisSystematics Review

Identifiers

PMID39794703
PMCPMC11721091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.