ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025
Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life and Use of Medicinal Cannabis: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies on medicinal cannabis (MC) have primarily investigated effects on diseases and symptoms, while there is only sparse knowledge on patients' health-related quality of life. Our aim was, firstly, to compare the health-related quality of life of patients (MC users and non-users) within four specified diagnostic indications (multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuropathy, and nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy) with that of patients with other diagnostic indications (MC users only) and the adult population (non-users only). Secondly, we estimate the associations between use of MC and health-related quality of life for patients in the four specified diagnostic indications.
methodsWe collected data on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), using EQ-5D-3L, and patients' self-reported use of MC in a Danish nationwide online survey distributed to 23,846 patients in October 2020. We compared QALY scores of all groups using a two-tailed t-test, listed QALY scores of MC users versus non-users, and investigated associations between QALY score and MC use using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses. Significance level was set to p-value < 0.05.
resultsA total of 9265 patients took part in the survey. All diagnostic indications had a statistically significant lower QALY score than the adult population (0.87). Paraplegia patients had the lowest QALY score, being 0.36 lower, followed by other diagnostic indication (- 0.34), multiple sclerosis (- 0.20), neuropathy (- 0.13), and nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy (- 0.06). MC users had a statistically significant lower QALY score than non-users (0.44 vs 0.74). Users redeeming 1-6 and ≥ 7 MC prescriptions (except for paraplegia patients) had a statistically significant lower QALY score than non-users, ranging between 0.11-0.24 and 0.26-0.32 lower than non-users, accordingly. Although, it should be noted that the number of users was small when stratifying by number of prescriptions.
conclusionPatients with either multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuropathy, or nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy had a significantly lower health-related quality of life than individuals from the adult population. Users of medicinal cannabis also had a significantly lower health-related quality of life compared with non-users, in all diagnostic indications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.