ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
A smart tool for non expert clinicians for the dissemination of the MDS criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Short Version of Carers' Quality of Life Questionnaire for Parkinsonism: Data from Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Network.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the variety of clinical phenotypes and the massive clinical overlap with other neurodegenerative diseases, the diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) remains a major challenge. Notwithstanding, early and reliable clinical diagnosis of PSP is highly warranted for estimation of prognosis, appropriate allocation to therapeutic trials and development of new diagnostic tools. As reliable biomarkers are lacking, PSP diagnosis relies on the application of the clinical criteria promoted by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS). Despite providing a framework including all the main PSP cornerstones (ocular dysfunction and postural instability, akinesia and cognitive dysfunction), the application of the MDS PSP criteria is complex and not straightforward to apply in a clinical setting. Herein we propose a practical tool, including a video-guided slide-set and a smartsheet, to disseminate the MDS PSP clinical criteria among healthy practitioners and increase confidence in non expert clinicians towards suspicion and diagnosis of PSP. The video-guided slide set may serve as a teaching resource for both general neurologists and practitioners, while the smartsheet may represent a valid support in attributing the degree of diagnostic certainty and phenotype based on the identified clinical features. Application of our tool may improve early recognition of patients in primary and secondary care and determine a prompt referral to third level movement disorder centers for consideration in clinical trials testing disease-modifying treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.