ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia older than 70 years within the last 30 years, a single center experience.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized Venetoclax Dose Adjustment in Unfit Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Real-Life Case Series Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As median age of patients with acute myeloid leukemia is 72 years, older patients continue to be a vulnerable cohort representing significant challenges in clinical practice. Patient-specific comorbidities as well as leukemia-specific unfavorable molecular- and cytogenetics confer even poorer outcomes. Treatment of AML therefore needs to be less toxic to prevent harm while lowering or eradicating leukemic burden to prolong survival. In this retrospective analysis we included 365 older AML patients from the Düsseldorf registry who were diagnosed and treated in our department of hematology over a period of 31 years. Most patients were treated with HMA (37.3%) followed by 35.3% of patients who received either low dose chemotherapy or BSC. 9% of patients were treated with induction chemotherapy while 8.5% of patients received a combination of HMA with venetoclax. 4.1% of patients underwent allografting. At the time of last follow up, 35 patients (9.6%) were still alive. Of those patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy or HMA + venetoclax, 18.2% and 29.0% were still alive, whereas 60% of the patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation were still alive (p < 0.001). Median overall survival of the entire patient population was 6 months. Longest survival was observed in patients who underwent aHSCT with an unreached median overall survival followed by patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy (21 months) or HMA plus venetoclax (11 months). The implementation of HMA + venetoclax and increasing numbers of aHSCT improved prognosis and survival even in older AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.