Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794531›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2025

Outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia older than 70 years within the last 30 years, a single center experience.

Felicitas Schulz, Claudia Roggenbuck, Andrea Kündgen, Annika Kasprzak, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Paul Jäger, Sascha Dietrich, Guido Kobbe, Ulrich Germing, Frank Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felicitas SchulzDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany. FelicitasIsabel.Schulz@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Claudia RoggenbuckDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Andrea KündgenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Annika KasprzakDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Kathrin NachtkampDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Paul JägerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Sascha DietrichDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Guido KobbeDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Ulrich GermingDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Frank NeumannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As median age of patients with acute myeloid leukemia is 72 years, older patients continue to be a vulnerable cohort representing significant challenges in clinical practice. Patient-specific comorbidities as well as leukemia-specific unfavorable molecular- and cytogenetics confer even poorer outcomes. Treatment of AML therefore needs to be less toxic to prevent harm while lowering or eradicating leukemic burden to prolong survival. In this retrospective analysis we included 365 older AML patients from the Düsseldorf registry who were diagnosed and treated in our department of hematology over a period of 31 years. Most patients were treated with HMA (37.3%) followed by 35.3% of patients who received either low dose chemotherapy or BSC. 9% of patients were treated with induction chemotherapy while 8.5% of patients received a combination of HMA with venetoclax. 4.1% of patients underwent allografting. At the time of last follow up, 35 patients (9.6%) were still alive. Of those patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy or HMA + venetoclax, 18.2% and 29.0% were still alive, whereas 60% of the patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation were still alive (p < 0.001). Median overall survival of the entire patient population was 6 months. Longest survival was observed in patients who underwent aHSCT with an unreached median overall survival followed by patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy (21 months) or HMA plus venetoclax (11 months). The implementation of HMA + venetoclax and increasing numbers of aHSCT improved prognosis and survival even in older AML patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAgedAged, 80 and overBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesvenetoclaxAcute myeloid leukemiaPrognosisTreatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID39794531
PMCPMC11868243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.