ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2025
Biological and environmental degradation of two-dimensional materials.
Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological degradation of B/N-doped carbon nano-onions and the autophagy induction in macrophages.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Biodegradable Aurum: Gold Nanosheets Undergo Biodegradation by Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase.Small science · 2026Article
- Graphene Triggers Inflammation in Murine Microglia via Phagocytosis.Small science · 2026Article
- Biocompatibility and immunomodulation of MXenes for targeted delivery of bioactive agents and drugs.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- What is next for LLMs? Pushing the boundaries of next-gen AI computing hardware with photonic chips.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- 2D Hexagonal Boron Nitride (h-BN) and 1D Boron Nitride Nanotubes (BNNTs): Distinct Effects at the Cellular Level in Fish Cell Lines.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the use of two-dimensional materials continues to grow, so too does the need to understand the environmental and biological impact of such materials. Degradation is a critical step in the life cycle of any material, but the majority of such knowledge is obtained from test tube and in vitro studies. Therefore, there remains a gap in understanding the degradability of two-dimensional materials in complex systems (in vivo) and in different ambient environments. In this Review, we highlight the need for more data-driven studies on the degradation of two-dimensional materials, including their kinetics, by-products, stability and possible downstream effects. Although challenging, building an understanding of the degradation profiles of different advanced materials in various environments at the chemical and molecular level is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39794485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.