Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A high-throughput ResNet CNN approach for automated grapevine leaf hair quantification.

Nagarjun Malagol, Tanuj Rao, Anna Werner, Reinhard Töpfer, Ludger Hausmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A novel resistance locus from an unexploited East Asian Vitis coignetiae confers resistance to grapevine downy mildew.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nagarjun MalagolJulius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833, Siebeldingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6620-6058
Tanuj RaoJulius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833, Siebeldingen, Germany.
Anna WernerJulius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833, Siebeldingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8755-1435
Reinhard TöpferJulius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833, Siebeldingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-2495
Ludger HausmannJulius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833, Siebeldingen, Germany. ludger.hausmann@julius-kuehn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4046-9626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hairiness of the leaves is an essential morphological feature within the genus Vitis that can serve as a physical barrier. A high leaf hair density present on the abaxial surface of the grapevine leaves influences their wettability by repelling forces, thus preventing pathogen attack such as downy mildew and anthracnose. Moreover, leaf hairs as a favorable habitat may considerably affect the abundance of biological control agents. The unavailability of accurate and efficient objective tools for quantifying leaf hair density makes the study intricate and challenging. Therefore, a validated high-throughput phenotyping tool was developed and established in order to detect and quantify leaf hair using images of single grapevine leaf discs and convolution neural networks (CNN). We trained modified ResNet CNNs with a minimalistic number of images to efficiently classify the area covered by leaf hairs. This approach achieved an overall model prediction accuracy of 95.41%. As final validation, 10,120 input images from a segregating F1 biparental population were used to evaluate the algorithm performance. ResNet CNN-based phenotypic results compared to ground truth data received by two experts revealed a strong correlation with R values of 0.98 and 0.92 and root-mean-square error values of 8.20% and 14.18%, indicating that the model performance is consistent with expert evaluations and outperforms the traditional manual rating. Additional validation between expert vs. non-expert on six varieties showed that non-experts contributed to over- and underestimation of the trait, with an absolute error of 0% to 30% and -5% to -60%, respectively. Furthermore, a panel of 16 novice evaluators produced significant bias on set of varieties. Our results provide clear evidence of the need for an objective and accurate tool to quantify leaf hairiness.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPlant LeavesVitisAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhenotypeCNNGrapevineLeaf hairPhenotypingVitis

Identifiers

PMID39794464
PMCPMC11724064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.