ArticleScientific reports2025
Design and optimal tuning of fractional order PID controller for paper machine headbox using jellyfish search optimizer algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight metaheuristic-driven adaptive PID approach for nonlinear conical tank regulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive tuning of fractional order PID controllers for nonlinear processes using hybrid PSO DQN reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for PID Control Parameter Tuning in Artillery Stabilization Systems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This manuscript proposes the Jellyfish Search Optimization (JSO) algorithm-based Fractional Order Proportional-Integral-Derivative (FOPID) controller tuning for a paper machine headbox. The novelty of this method lies in integrating the JSO technique for optimizing the parameters of the FOPID controller to monitor and control headbox pressure and stock level efficiently and effectively. The JSO algorithm ensures optimal tuning of controller parameters by minimizing error indices such as Integral of Squared Error (ISE), Integral of Time Absolute Error (ITAE), and Integral of Absolute Error (IAE). Simulations conducted on the MATLAB/Simulink platform demonstrate that the FOPID controller tuned using JSO achieves superior performance compared to conventional PI (Proportional-Integral) and PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controllers. Specifically, the JSO-tuned FOPID controller exhibited a 25% reduction in rise time, a 30% improvement in settling time, and a 20% decrease in overshoot when compared to the PID controller. Furthermore, comparative analyses with other optimization techniques, including Moth Flame Optimization (MFO), Ant Lion Optimization (ALO), and Elephant Herding Optimization (EHO), reveal that the JSO algorithm provides higher accuracy and stability in diverse operating conditions. This study underscores the efficacy of the JSO-tuned FOPID controller as a robust solution for complex industrial applications, such as paper machine headbox systems, and highlights its potential to enhance process efficiency and control precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.