ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk assessment of water inrush from coal floor based on enhanced samples with class distribution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the risk assessment of water inrush from coal floors, the amount of measured data obtained through on-site testing is small and random, which limits the prediction accuracy and generalizability of a model based on measured data. Using the distribution characteristics of the measured data and mega-trend diffusion theory, we propose a virtual sample enhancement method based on class distribution mega-trend diffusion technology (CDMTD) and introduce constraints on the class distribution of influencing factors. This method was used to generate virtual samples and enhance the measured database. A prediction model of the water inrush risk for the coal seam floor was established using a coupled algorithm of extreme learning machines, self-adaptive differential evolution, and CDMTD (PCA-CDMTD-SaDE-ELM) and was used to evaluate the water inrush risk in the 19,105 working face of the Yunjialing Mine. The CDMTD method could effectively solve the problem of virtual sample distribution variation in the overall trend diffusion theory and enhance the measured database, reducing the impact of small sample sizes. Compared to other optimization models, our model showed the best prediction performance, with an error reduction of 42.95-51.27% and results biased towards safety. Our results support safe and efficient coal mining above Ordovician limestone-confined water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.