ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of arthroscopic repair of the subscapularis tendon combined with coracoplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- L-Shaped Three-Portal Configuration for Arthroscopic Double-Row Suture Repair of Lafosse Type III and IV Subscapularis Tears.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair combined with coracoplasty in the treatment. The study involved 80 patients (46 males, 34 females; aged 33 to 73 years), who underwent arthroscopic repair for subscapularis tears (type I, II, and III) presenting symptoms of anterior shoulder pain and tenderness. Subcoracoid impingement was defined as a coracohumeral distance of less than 6 mm on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, with a follow-up of was at least two years. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A underwent coracoplasty, while Group B did not. The postoperative functional outcomes of the two groups were compared and analyzed using an independent sample t-test. The patients' prognosis was assessed pre- and postoperatively using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)pain score. Postoperatively, primary wound healing was successful in all patients, with no systemic or localized shoulder joint infections or brachial plexus nerve injuries. Both groups showed improvements in overall functional outcomes after surgical intervention. At the 24-month follow-up, all evaluated parameters in both groups demonstrated improvements compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). The functional scores significantly increased in both groups post-surgery compared to preoperative values (p < 0.01). When comparing the two groups using an independent sample t-test, the p-values for all indicators, except forward flexion range of motion, were below 0.01. The statistical analysis indicated that patients in Group A had better recovery outcomes than those in Group B, except for forward flexion. The results suggested that subcoracoid impingement syndrome could potentially be a significant precursor to subscapularis tendon injuries. It is noteworthy noting that the combined approach of subscapularis tendon repair and coracoplasty showed superior therapeutic efficacy compared to isolated subscapularis tendon repair when subscapularis tendon injuries were associated with subcoracoid impingement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.