Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794416›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2025

Diagnostic evaluation and management of recurrent urinary tract infections in the spinal cord injury population - a retrospective evaluation at a tertiary care center.

Christopher S Elliott, Hien-Khanh Huynh, Kazuko Shem

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher S ElliottStanford University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Stanford, CA, USA. christopher.elliott@hhs.sccgov.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-0018
Hien-Khanh HuynhStanford University School of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kazuko ShemSanta Clara Valley Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, San Jose, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective review.

objectivesWhile most individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are expected to have 1-2 urinary tract infections (UTIs) per year, there is a subset with higher incidence. We evaluate our practice to characterize common causes of recurrent UTIs, hypothesizing that more frequent infections typically have addressable risk factors.

settingTertiary urology clinic, San Jose, CA.

methodsWe reviewed patients with SCI referred to a tertiary urology clinic for evaluation and management of "recurrent UTIs" during the years 2015-2020. Following workup, the suspected cause of recurrent UTIs and number of post-specialty evaluation UTIs (patient reported) were noted.

resultsForty persons with SCI with a mean of 4.8 UTI treatments in the prior year comprised our cohort with most performing CIC (80%). After workup, 37/40 (92.5%) had a likely cause for their reported recurrent UTIs. In 16/40 (40%), careful questioning determined that the patient was not having UTIs based on guideline definitions. In those with confirmed recurrent UTIs, a bladder diary (62.5%) or urodynamic study (64%) was more likely to identify a cause compared to imaging (2.6%) or cystoscopy (8%). With a minimum 1-year follow-up, 90% of our population had a 50% or more reduction in UTI incidence, mostly using non-antibiotic strategies.

conclusionIn a referral SCI population with a chief complaint of "recurrent UTIs", over a third were not having UTIs. In addition to detailed history, a bladder diary +/- urodynamics are most useful in finding the cause and improving UTI.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.