Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dynamics and development of interhemispheric conflict solving in pigeons.

Martina Manns, Kevin Haselhuhn, Nadja Freund

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martina MannsDivision of Experimental and Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr- University, Bochum, Germany. Martina.Manns@rub.de.
Kevin HaselhuhnDepartment of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Nadja FreundDivision of Experimental and Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr- University, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dominance of one hemisphere for cognitive operations and decision making may be an efficient mechanism solving interhemispheric conflicts. To understand the ecological significance of the so-called metacontrol, we need better knowledge of its frequency and ontogenetic foundations. Since in pigeons, embryonic light experiences influence degree and direction of interhemispheric specialization and communication, it is conceivable that light affects metacontrol mechanisms. We therefore trained pigeons (Columba livia) with and without embryonic light stimulation in a colour discrimination task. Each eye/hemisphere learnt a different set of colours. After training, hemispheric-specific information was put into conflict and the analysis of conflict decision pattern allowed the identification of hemispheric dominance under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. A majority of pigeons displayed individual metacontrol independent of embryonic light experiences though not in the first test session. Reaction times indicate that interhemispheric mechanisms are critically involved in mediating the dominance of one hemisphere. The impact of interhemispheric components rises with increasing experience and even affects decision making under monocular seeing conditions. Overall results indicate that the hemispheres do not evaluate information independently and that interhemispheric communication in the pigeon brain is much stronger than previously thought and becomes more important with increasing experience.

Indexed as

ColumbidaeFunctional LateralityAnimalsColor PerceptionDecision MakingPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVision, BinocularAvianBirdDecision-makingLateralizationMetacontrolOntogenetic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID39794396
PMCPMC11723973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.