ArticleScientific reports2025
Combination of gray level features with deep transfer learning for copra classification using machine learning and neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Partially occluded weed classification using vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for precision agriculture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep dictionary learning with reconstruction for texture recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copra (dried coconut) is used for oil production and raw materials for its by-products. Traditionally, Coconuts are halved and sun-dried in the field. Fumigation using sulphur is employed in the industry to maintain its colour and prevent microbial growth from inhibiting it. The proposed study aims to classify the sulphur-fumigated copra and normally dried copra to benefit the buyers. Images of copra were collected from various drying industries and segmented to exclude irrelevant parts. A novel approach is introduced by combining GLCM (Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix) features with features extracted from four transfer learning models. These concatenated features were evaluated using various machine learning classifiers and neural networks. Among the classifiers tested, Neural Network-based Pattern Recognition (NNPR) achieved the highest accuracy of 99.6%, sensitivity of 99.64%, specificity of 99.64%, F1-Score of 99.6, and a Kappa score of 0.99, demonstrating its superior performance. Other classifiers, such as Logistic Regression (98.3% accuracy, 0.96 Kappa), Kk-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) (98.3% accuracy, 0.96 Kappa), and Random Forest (98.9% accuracy, 0.97 Kappa), also performed well but slightly lower than the neural network. This methodology outperforms existing literature and provides a robust solution for accurately classifying sulphur-fumigated copra, ensuring its practical utility for farmers and buyers in the copra industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.