ArticleScientific reports2025
InSAR-YOLOv8 for wide-area landslide detection in InSAR measurements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilayer pyramid pooling self-attention for landslide detection using vision transformers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on Benggang identification and deformation monitoring based on optical and Radar data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Meets InSAR for Infrastructure Monitoring: A Systematic Review of Models, Applications, and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Review of Strain-Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors for Geohazard Monitoring: An Update.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
InSAR monitoring technology is widely used in investigating landslide hazards. Leveraging object detection algorithms to quickly extract landslide information from Wide-Area InSAR measurements is of great significance. Our InSAR-YOLOv8, an algorithm that automatically detects landslides from InSAR measurements, addresses the low accuracy and suboptimal detection performance of existing network models. In this method, we first design and add a detection head specifically targeting small-scale objects. This improvement enhances the model's ability to extract features across different scales and strengthens its capability to detect landslides of varying sizes. We also replace the original C2f module with the lighter C2f_Faster module to process information more efficiently, making the model lighter and more efficient. Finally, the SIoU loss function replaces the CIoU loss function to improve the bounding box regression and enhance detection accuracy. Our results show that the proposed algorithm achieves a 97.41% mAP50, a 66.47% mAP50:95, and a 92.06% F1 score on the InSAR landslide dataset, while reducing the number of parameters by 25%. Compared with YOLOv8 and other advanced models (YOLOvX, Faster R-CNN, etc.), our model exhibits distinct advantages and possesses a wider range of potential applications in InSAR measurement for landslide detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.