ArticleNature communications2025
Coherent Anti-Stokes Hyper-Raman Spectroscopy.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five-modal multiphoton microscopy enabled by a tunable dual-wavelength fiber laser.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Polarization-Resolved Approach to the Origin of the Nonresonant Background in Coherent Anti-Stokes Hyper-Raman Scattering Spectroscopy.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026Article
- Measurement of a Preresonant Hyper-Raman Hyperpolarizability.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Quantifying Inter- and Intramolecular Interactions in Liquids with Correlated Vibrational Spectroscopy: Case Study of CClThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Mixed Domain IR-Hyper-Raman Four Wave Mixing Spectroscopy.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Research on the Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Programmable Lighting Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optically programable quasi phase matching in four-wave mixing.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coherent Raman scattering spectroscopies have been established as a powerful tool for investigating molecular systems with high chemical specificity. The existing coherent Raman scattering techniques detect only Raman active modes, which are a part of the whole molecular vibrations. Here, we report the first observation of coherent anti-Stokes hyper-Raman scattering (CAHRS) spectroscopy, which allows measuring hyper-Raman active vibrations at high speed. The CAHRS process relies on a fifth-order nonlinear process that combines hyper-Raman scattering with coherent Raman scattering. Observed signals are proven to come from the CAHRS process through various experiments concerning the dependences of the signals on incident laser powers, time-delay, polarizations, and selection rules of molecular vibrations. Comparisons of CAHRS signals with spontaneous hyper-Raman signals from para-nitroaniline solutions and benzene liquid manifest much higher signal-to-noise ratios of CAHRS signals than spontaneous hyper-Raman signals. This study illustrates that CAHRS spectroscopy can offer additional information on molecular vibrations unobtainable from the present coherent Raman techniques at a much higher speed than spontaneous hyper-Raman spectroscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.