Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794321›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

A left-to-right bias in number-space mapping across ages and cultures.

Elena Eccher, Mathilde Josserand, Serge Caparos, Esther Boissin, Marco Buiatti, Manuela Piazza, Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Culture shapes the SNARC-like effect for visual speed.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena Eccher *Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, (TN), Italy. elena.eccher-1@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-3452
Mathilde Josserand *Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, (TN), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-0537
Serge CaparosLaboratoire DysCo, Université Paris 8, Saint-Denis, France.
Esther BoissinLaPsyDé, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-7466
Marco BuiattiCenter for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, (TN), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2362-7853
Manuela PiazzaCenter for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, (TN), Italy. manuela.piazza@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2557-9701
Giorgio VallortigaraCenter for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, (TN), Italy. giorgio.vallortigara@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-9062

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 833504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Number and space are inherently related. Previous research has provided evidence that numbers are aligned to a so-called "mental number line", which is malleable and affected by cultural factors mostly linked to literacy-related habits. However, preverbal humans and non-human animals also map numerosities into space, in a consistent left-to-right direction. These contrasting findings raise the question of whether Spatial Numerical Associations (SNA) are culturally or biologically determined. Here, we investigated Italian adults, Italian preschoolers, and Himba adults (an indigenous population with an oral cultural system) to examine whether cultural influences are necessary for SNA to emerge. We found that, when explicitly asked to order numerosities, only Italian adults showed a consistent left-to-right preference, while preschoolers and Himba adults did not have a consistent preference for one direction or the other. On the other hand, in a numerosity comparison task, all groups performed better when small numerosities were presented in the left hemispace. These results suggest that humans may display two forms of SNAs, one that emerges mostly in implicit tasks and is biologically determined, and one that emerges in explicit ordering tasks and is determined by cultural habits.

Indexed as

CultureFunctional LateralitySpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39794321
PMCPMC11724025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.